• Search the Site

Contemplation: Redeeming Our Miles

Contemplation: Redeeming Our Miles

Contemplation: Redeeming Our Miles 720 472 Tim Williams

Leer en Español

By Timothy P. Williams, Senior Director of Formation and Leadership Development 

“There but for the grace of God go I” we often think when we meet the neighbor on our home visits. We are reminded how precarious and fragile life can be, and how easily any one of us can fall into deprivation through no fault of our own. We offer our gentle encouragement and try to be as generous as possible in relieving the needs of our suffering neighbors. Often, we leave feeling deeply moved and even transformed by the encounter. These visits seem to bear out Frédéric’s observation that they are “more for ourselves than for them”. [82, to Curnier, 1834]

But then there are the “frequent flyers.” You know, the ones who just called last month, and the month before, and who knows how many times before that. It isn’t just that they call frequently – sometimes we don’t hear from them for a year. It just seems like when they do call, it’s always the same thing, and it so often seems easily avoidable. We know them already. We’ve met them a dozen times. It’s hard to identify with them, because sometimes it seems like they are just choosing to fall behind.

And they don’t seem to listen to our advice, or at least not to heed it. They don’t have to follow our advice, of course, but we’ve tried to develop a relationship of trust and friendship. We only offer advice out of love, and our help is never conditional on taking our advice.

But come on! How many times do we have to keep doing the same old thing before we just cut them off? We don’t want to give up on them, but maybe we should try to be a little more – I don’t know – tough?

That’s hard to do, too, though, isn’t it? Even if it seems like their own fault that the light bill is overdue (again) we don’t want them to suffer in the summer heat. Even if they spent that big tax refund last month (why are they getting a tax refund anyway?) instead of thinking about the rent this month, we don’t want to see them (and their kids) thrown out on the street.

Our frustration builds when we see who’s calling. We already know what they’re calling about. It’s the thing they were certain would never happen again, so before we answer, we try to remind ourselves it isn’t supposed to be about the money, even though it always seems to work out that way. If it is “more for ourselves than for them”, is it they who are missing something each time we talk, or is it us?

And so, the call for mercy begins, just as it always does: “Bless me, Father, for I have sinned…”

Contemplate

Do I offer the same mercy that I am prepared to accept for myself?

Recommended Reading

Letters of Frédéric Ozanam, Volume I

Contemplación: Redimiendo Nuestras Millas

Traducción de Sandra Joya

“Si no fuera por la gracia de Dios, me iría”, pensamos a menudo cuando nos encontramos con el prójimo en nuestras visitas domiciliarias. Recordamos lo precaria y frágil que puede ser la vida, y con qué facilidad cualquiera de nosotros puede caer en la privación sin culpa alguna. Ofrecemos nuestro amable apoyo y tratamos de ser lo más generosos posible para aliviar las necesidades de nuestros vecinos que sufren. A menudo, nos vamos profundamente conmovidos e incluso transformados por el encuentro. Estas visitas parecen confirmar la observación de Frédéric de que son “más para nosotros mismos que para ellos”. [82, a Curnier, 1834]

Pero luego están los “viajeros frecuentes”. Ya saben, los que llamaron el mes pasado, y el anterior, y quién sabe cuántas veces antes. No es solo que llamen con frecuencia; a veces no sabemos nada de ellos durante un año.  Parece que cuando llaman, siempre es lo mismo, y a menudo parece fácil evitarlo. Ya los conocemos. Los hemos visto una docena de veces. Es difícil identificarse con ellos, porque a veces parece que simplemente eligen quedarse atrás.
Y no parecen escuchar nuestros consejos, o al menos no prestarles atención. No tienen por qué seguirlos, por supuesto, pero hemos intentado cultivar una relación de confianza y amistad. Solo ofrecemos consejos por amor, y nuestra ayuda nunca está condicionada a que los aceptemos.

¡Pero vamos! ¿Cuántas veces tenemos que seguir haciendo lo mismo de siempre antes de cortarles la comunicación? No queremos renunciar a ellos, pero quizá deberíamos intentar ser un poco más, no sé, ¿duros?

Aunque eso también es difícil, ¿verdad?  Aunque parezca culpa suya que la factura de la luz esté atrasada (de nuevo), no queremos que sufran el calor del verano. Aunque gastaron esa gran devolución de impuestos el mes pasado (¿para qué la reciben?), en lugar de pensar en el alquiler este mes, no queremos verlos (ni a sus hijos) abandonados a su suerte.

Nuestra frustración aumenta al ver quién llama. Ya sabemos por qué llaman. Es lo que estaban seguros de que nunca volvería a ocurrir, así que antes de contestar, intentamos recordarnos que no se supone que sea por dinero, aunque siempre parezca funcionar así. Si es “más por nosotros que por ellos”, ¿son ellos los que se pierden algo cada vez que hablamos, o somos nosotros?

 

Y así, como siempre, comienza la súplica de misericordia: «Bendíceme, Padre, porque he pecado…».

 

Contemplar

¿Ofrezco la misma misericordia que estoy dispuesto a aceptar para mí?

9 Comments
  • Dorothy S. Stewart October 13, 2025 at 10:20 am

    Thanks for this “so-true” reflection. How often over the years I have felt this frustration:
    the woman whose son, grandchildren, and great grandchildren all depend on her (and then SVDP) to bale them out, and she allows them to;
    the neighbor who refuses to get a job and lies about being on the school substitute call list;
    the man whom we go out of a payday loan and then gets another!
    I think we have to help the neighbor – but also talk about basic financial sense.

    Dorothy

  • This hit home. I hear this expressed so often in our conference. It does become difficult to remember what we are there for. Thank you for this reminder.

  • Sometimes our Vincentian spirit in not wanting to see our neighbors fail is due to our own personal pride. “If we had faith the size of a mustard seed” we would continue to pray for our FINs who continuously ask for the same assistance and allow natural consequences to take place by “letting go and letting God.” We interfere with God’s saving grace when we act as continuous saviors ourselves. A hand-up is always better than a hand-out because that behavior recognizes God’s personal love in creating each of us in His own image.

  • We often set boundaries for assistance, that our Lord would have dismissed. Our guidelines were initially set, because they were handed down to us from District. We didn’t know any better. It pains me greatly when funds are available and the thought that we have helped them before is the basis for not helping them keep the lights on now. How do you resolve this in your conferences? Should we have limits?

  • Thank you for the reminder that the Master is calling ….with all OUR sins and weaknesses. Lord, have mercy, let me not judge.
    Melissa Quiming

  • I never liked the term frequent flyers for our neighbors–it seems disrespectful to me. Anyone else?

    • Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Yes, I agree it is very disrespectful, but it is an expression that, unfortunately, I commonly hear.

      We should also avoid words like “client”, or acronyms like “NIN” or “FIN”. They depersonalize our relationship, a relationship that our Rule says should be “based on trust and friendship”.

      “Neighbor” isn’t a euphemism. It is the word our Lord used, and it ought to be good enough for us, along with brother, sister, or friend.

  • I agree that “frequent flyers” seems disrespectful. I would also hope that districts don’t impose limits on our neighbors, especially if we have the funds. What seems to work best is when the visitors present the latest visit with the same focus of LOVE used during the visit- the same LOVE of Christ within all of our hearts! (But eventual talking with neighbors about budgets can be helpful!)

  • Cape May County New Jersey. This certainly hits home in the big way., I am compassionate, which is why I’m a member of SVDP, But is the only male, I find it a necessary evil to have to shut people down, who I believe are milking the system. I know, and understand that the financial problems for some of them will never end, Our society just isn’t meant to deal with maintaining the same home with funds that are limited, We are the stewards for the money that the people in the Paris donate and we can’t donate it to the same people we have to spread it out. And when I spread this opinion, I know it makes me come across this cold, but we have a responsibility

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.
Skip to content